The suggestion to "drop the T" from LGBTQ+—effectively separating transgender individuals from the broader queer community—represents a fundamental misunderstanding of both the movement's history and its core values. Transgender inclusion isn't optional but essential to the integrity and effectiveness of the LGBTQ+ movement for several critical reasons.
Historical Foundation and Shared Struggle
Transgender activists have been at the forefront of LGBTQ+ liberation from its earliest days. Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, transgender women of color, were instrumental figures in the 1969 Stonewall Uprising—the watershed moment widely recognized as the catalyst for the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement. Their courage and leadership established a foundation upon which decades of progress have been built. Excluding transgender people from the community they helped create not only erases this vital history but betrays the very principles of solidarity that have powered the movement's achievements.
Interconnected Experiences of Oppression
While sexual orientation and gender identity are distinct aspects of human experience, the oppression faced by both groups stems from the same root: rigid social enforcement of gender norms and sexuality. The discrimination experienced by lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals is fundamentally linked to societal expectations about how people should express their gender and who they should love based on that gender. Transgender people face discrimination precisely because they challenge these same rigid gender expectations. This shared source of oppression creates natural allyship that strengthens both causes.
Strategic Unity Against Common Opposition
Those advocating for transgender exclusion often fail to recognize that many of the same political and social forces seeking to limit transgender rights are simultaneously working to roll back protections for lesbian, gay, and bisexual people. When examined closely, many "drop the T" campaigns receive support from organizations with broader anti-LGBTQ+ agendas. These attempts to divide the community serve external interests that benefit from a fractured movement. Unity represents not just moral integrity but strategic necessity in the face of coordinated opposition.
Protection for the Most Vulnerable
Transgender individuals, particularly transgender women of color, face disproportionately high rates of violence, employment discrimination, homelessness, and healthcare barriers. Excluding the community's most vulnerable members contradicts the ethical responsibility to protect those facing the most severe forms of discrimination. A movement that abandons its most marginalized members fundamentally compromises its moral authority and claim to justice.
The Strength of Inclusive Advocacy
History has repeatedly demonstrated that social justice movements are most effective when they build broad, inclusive coalitions. The most significant LGBTQ+ legal and social victories have been achieved through unified efforts that recognize the interconnectedness of various forms of discrimination. Fragmenting the movement weakens advocacy infrastructure, dilutes political influence, and ultimately hinders progress for everyone involved.
Beyond Zero-Sum Thinking
Arguments for transgender exclusion often rely on the flawed premise that transgender inclusion somehow diminishes resources or attention for lesbian, gay, and bisexual concerns. This zero-sum perspective fails to recognize how addressing systematic discrimination benefits the entire community. Progress for transgender people creates legal precedents, cultural shifts, and institutional changes that strengthen protections for all LGBTQ+ individuals.
The LGBTQ+ community's strength has always derived from its diversity and its commitment to standing together against shared oppression. Removing the "T" would not only betray this founding principle but would weaken the movement's moral foundation and political effectiveness. True progress requires solidarity—recognizing that liberation for any of us depends on liberation for all of us. The future of LGBTQ+ rights lies not in division but in deepening our commitment to inclusion and mutual support across all dimensions of gender and sexuality.
Citations:
https://www.reddit.com/r/lgbt/comments/1gewosq/lgb_but_not_the_t/
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/why-it-s-time-to-take-the-t-out-of-lgbt-10493352.html
https://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/29330/1/is-it-time-to-take-the-t-out-of-lgbt
https://www.advocate.com/transgender/2015/11/06/lgbt-groups-respond-petition-asking-drop-t
https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/is-queer-ok-to-say-heres-why-we-use-it
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/11/can-you-take-the-t-out-of-lgbt.html
https://www.stonewall.org.uk/resources/lgbtq-hubs/trans-hub/the-truth-about-trans